Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 01775
Original file (BC 2012 01775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-01775
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The 18 days of leave she lost in the beginning of fiscal year 
(FY) 2011 be restored.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Finance did not process her leave from Jul 2010, until Oct 2011.  
Because of this she lost 18 days of leave.

In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of her 
DFAS Forms 702, Defense Finance and Accounting Service Military 
Leave and Earnings Statement, and a screen shot of from the Air 
Force Financial Leave Request and Approval System. 

Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of master sergeant (MSgt, E-7).

According to the information provided by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility the applicant carried forward 63.5 days 
of leave at the beginning of FY 2010.  She earned 30 days of 
leave, and used 34 days of leave during FY 2010.  She carried 
forward 63.5 days of leave at the beginning of FY 2011, earned 
30 days of leave, and used 37 days of leave during FY 2011.  The 
applicant's leave balance at the beginning of FY 2011 was 
56.5 days.

________________________________________________________________





AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
 
HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  DPSIM states that in 
accordance with AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, Special 
Leave Accrual (SLA), members who are faced with circumstances 
that prohibit them from taking leave to accumulate leave in 
excess of 60 days (75 days until 30 Sept 2013).  The situation 
preventing members from using leave must have been caused by a 
catastrophe, national emergency and/or crisis or operations in 
defense of national security.  SLA shall not be used as a means 
to authorize the accumulation of leave in excess of 60 days that 
is a result of members' failure to properly manage their leave 
balance.

The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 1 Oct 2012, for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C).  As of this date, this office has not received a 
response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 20 Dec 2012, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

    XXXXXXX, Panel Chair
    XXXXXXX, Member
    XXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-01775:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 5 Apr 2012, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 21 Sep 2012.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Oct 2012.




                                   XXXXXXX
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03471

    Original file (BC-2012-03471.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03471 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 17 days of lost leave be restored, or as an alternative, he be allowed to sell back 15 days of leave. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, explains Special Leave Accrual (SLA) allows members who are faced with circumstances that prohibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00868

    Original file (BC 2014 00868.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice that warrants restoring 2.5 days of leave to the applicant’s records. If, at any time, the leave balance drops to or goes below 60 days (75 days during the period 1 Oct 08 to 30 Sep 15), then...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04460

    Original file (BC-2011-04460.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Member’s application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. If the Board restores leave to current leave account, members must use these days before the end of the current FY.” On 29 Nov 2011, DPSIMC requested additional documentation from the applicant to support his claim; specifically orders received from all deployments that prevented him from using the lost four days of leave during FY 2011. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01302

    Original file (BC-2012-01302.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01302 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 27 days of leave she lost at the end of fiscal year (FY) 2011 be restored. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was unable to use 27 days of leave due to her being deployed in support of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01612

    Original file (BC-2012-01612.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01612 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 4 days of lost leave be restored. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, explains SLA shall not be a means to authorize the accumulation of leave in excess of 60 days (75 days from 1 October 2008 through 30 September 2013) when it is a result of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03925

    Original file (BC-2011-03925.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This extension was completed, signed, and approved in Mar 2009; however, the local personnel office said they could not update the system until 1 Dec 2009, which was the first day of her extension. In this regard, we note that DPSIM initially recommended disapproval of the applicant’s request; however, after reviewing the extension paperwork, DPSIM now recommends 17.5 days of leave be restored to her leave account and we agree. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04787

    Original file (BC-2012-04787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary which is attached at Exhibits C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not demonstrated a clear error or injustice. If at any time the leave balance drops to or goes below 75 days, then there is no longer any SLA protected leave. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00465

    Original file (BC-2011-00465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) and FY08, she requested SLA and was approved to carryover 120 days of leave. However, she came to understand that her SLA request in FY09 was lost when she changed jobs and was informed in Oct 09 that she had to either sell back or lose 10 days of leave. The application was timely filed.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05726

    Original file (BC-2012-05726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 1. The guidance states “members are ineligible for SLA when the following precludes using leave: Normal PCS moves and TDYs.” AFI 36-3003, also states in paragraph 4.1.5., “unit commanders: advise members who schedule “use or lose” leave in August...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01888

    Original file (BC-2005-01888.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant requests 60 days of leave be restored to his leave account and he be entitled to sell his leave upon his 1 May 2005 retirement. The Air Force has recommended restoring 60 days to the applicant’s leave account. In reviewing the applicant’s MMPA, DFAS determined, however, that the applicant’s account should have reflected 26.5 days of leave at the time of his retirement.